WHICH BIBLE IS
PRESERVED OF GOD?
By DAVID OTIS FULLER
(NOW WITH THE LORD)
The following is from a message recorded on
audio cassette in the 1970s.
In
every message of this nature we should begin with Scripture. I am now going
to quote one passage from the Old Testament and one passage from the New.
Isaiah
8:19-20 "And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have
familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not
a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? to the law and to
the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there
is no light in them."
Revelation
22:18-19 "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add
unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take
away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his
part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things
which are written in this book."
In
this message I will seek to give as clear account of this whole complex question
as I can, so that the ordinary layman who is not familiar with this particular
area of knowledge can get it without too much trouble.
Victor
Hugo, the great French novelist, wrote upon one occasion: "Greater than
the threat of mighty armies, or the barriers of isolation, is the irresistible
force of an idea whose hour has come." You know what Thomas Edison did,
don't you?
Of
course you do. He had an idea that electricity could be put to good use in
light, and heat, and power, and look what we have today. That idea really
was irresistible once it started on its course. And then there were the Wright
brothers, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, who had an idea that they could fly
a heavier than air machine, and they did, and look what we have today.
We
have a measure of good from that, but an awful measure of bad, too, when we
think of the bombs that were dropped from planes, and what's happening today
across the world.
Now,
let's go back to 1859 when Charles Darwin produced his Origin of the Species.
The intellectual world of that day grasped at it and swallowed it whole. Why?
Because the carnal mind, or the mind that is at enmity against God, just does
not want to retain God in his or her knowledge, but is willing to go to any
length to try and banish Him from their minds, and indeed from this world,
if it were possible. We know there is not one single shred of evidence to
support organic evolution.
THE
REVISED VERSION OF 1881
Then
in 1881, the Revised Version of the Scriptures was published. Brook Foss Westcott,
late Bishop of Durham, and Fenton John Anthony Hort, were both professors
at Cambridge University, and without question were two of the most brilliant
and erudite scholars of their day, and to this day, nearly a century later.
They
command the attention and admiration of textual critics, both liberal and
conservative. The two together had been working for twenty years on a Greek
text of the New Testament. Around 1870 there was a demand made for another
version of the Scriptures. Westcott and Hort spearheaded this demand and influenced
many scholars and theologians to form a committee for a revised version which
appeared in 1881.
The
Westcott and Hort text was based upon two of the oldest manuscripts extant,
Codex Aleph and Codex Vaticanus. One was found in the wastepaper basket by
the great scholar Tischendorf on Mt. Sinai. The other was found in an out
of the way place in the Vatican museum with dust over it. The former was discovered
around 1859; the later some centuries before that; I believe in the thirteenth
century or thereabouts.
These
manuscripts are two of the worse in existence. They are filled with contradictions
and errors, and they contradict each other. In the Vatican manuscript all
of Revelation is missing, as well as all the Pastoral Epistles of Paul, and
from the ninth to the thirteenth chapter of Hebrews. They just aren't there.
So
it was quite a mutilated manuscript. But because they were the oldest, going
back to the fourth century, there were those scholars that almost revered
them and made much of the fact of these two manuscripts. The theory was that
the oldest manuscript was nearest to the original autographs written by the
Apostles and others.
But
it so happens that this is not the case. The oldest manuscripts have proven
to be the worst, because in the early days of Christianity a war was raging
between Athanasius and Arius concerning the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ.
We cannot thank God enough that Athanasius won, even though he was banished
five times by the emperor, because he was so tenacious and would not let this
matter go.
And
when some of his friends came to him and said, "Athanasius, the world
is against you," he drew himself up and uttered those famous words, "Athanasius
is against the world." Arius and his followers were unitarian, and it
is clear that many manuscripts in those days were corrupted doctrinally.
Both
ideas, evolution and that of the Westcott and Hort theory, have no foundation
whatever. They are made up of cobwebs, yet the Westcott and Hort Greek text
was founded squarely upon these two manuscripts, with a few others, but in
the main Codex Aleph and Codex Vaticanus were the ones that they relied upon
the most.
Now
this statement will make some of you who listen upset, but I'm going to make
it anyway. You and I at the present time are witnessing the most vicious and
malicious attack ever made upon the Word of God since the Garden of Eden.
And this modern attack began in 1881 with the publication of the Revised Version.
In
the ten years that it took the committee in the Jerusalem Chamber in England
to produce this Revised Version, Westcott and Hort domineered, engineered,
and dominated the whole committee from beginning to end. They issued their
Greek text, which had not yet been released for publication, to all of the
members and swore them to secrecy that they would not tell anyone what they
had done until after the Revised Version was published.
And
if it had not been for Prebendary Scrivener, who was a scholar as great as
Westcott and Hort and who fought tooth and nail against many of the things
Westcott and Hort were constantly seeking to insert into the Revised Version
from their two oldest texts, we would have had a far worse version of the
Bible in the RV than we do now.
The
vast majority of the people are confused, and you can't blame them, with a
hundred versions of the Scriptures now extant. Some of them are good versions,
but for the most part they are perversions, vagrant versions, and in some
cases, plain bastard Bibles.
If
you, my friend, think that such a term is too harsh, then will you please
let me turn to the read the King James Version in Psalm 22:16--"...they
pierced my Lord and Savior, is it not? But what does the NEB say? It says,
"... they hacked off my hands and my feet." That is blasphemy and
comes straight from the pit of hell, and I don't care who knows it.
Satan
has from the very beginning hated two objects more than anything else in this
world and universe. One is the Bible, the holy, infallible, inerrant, inspired
Word of God, and the second is Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God. God has
spoken once and for all in His Word, and He says in Proverbs 30:5, "Every
word of God is pure." In Psalm 138:2, "Thou hast magnified
thy word above all thy name." And in Exodus 34:14 we read
these words concerning God Himself: "For thou shalt worship no other
god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God."
When
our Lord Jesus Christ was on earth, the Father's voice was heard from heaven,
and it said in the plainest of terms, "This is my beloved Son, in
whom I am well pleased; hear ye him." And what He has said about
His Son, He also can and does say about His holy Word.
When
our Lord Jesus was in the wilderness, being attacked for forty days by Satan,
our Lord used the Old Testament, God's holy Word, exclusively when meeting
the attacks of Satan. That is exactly what we should do today. If we have
a Bible riddled with errors, how in the world can we use it as our final authority?
If all versions today have errors in them, including the KJV, then where is
the doctrine of inerrancy gone?
INERRANCY
WITHOUT PRESERVATION IS SENSELESS
But
someone replies, We believe in the inerrancy of the original manuscripts.
All right, I agree with you there. But then we ask the question, and it's
a good one, too: Was God careless? Or didn't He realize that these errors
were creeping in? Or was He impotent that He could not keep His Word even
if He wanted to? Look out yonder into space, will you please?
Listen
to some of the Christian astronomers and scientists who study the stars and
all the planets and constellations there in outer space, and they will tell
you that God has so created them in such a meticulous fashion that they obey
all the laws that He has laid down for His whole vast creation. If God is
that careful to keep His universe, do you think He is going to be careless
about His sacred, holy Word upon which hangs the destiny of the souls of men,
whether for heaven or hell?
You
know good and well He could not possibly be careless about such a wonderful
Book. But if you want to go ahead and believe in a God who has just let his
book go and become filled with errors through the mistakes of men, you go
ahead, but please count me out as of now.
I
gave an illustration of how men are tampering with the Word of God in the
New English Bible over against the KJV. Now let me give you another one. In
the New American Standard Version, which has been heralded and advertised
as the nearest to the originals, we find that in sixteen different places
the name of Christ is left out of His title, and in twelve different places
the name of the Lord is left out.
We
are facing a gigantic, titanic battle that is raging all around us, and my
prayer is that the sleeping, snoring, satisfied Christians will become aroused
to the need of taking their stand for God's holy Word.
There
are two books we have had the privilege of publishing, together over 600 pages,
giving definite, positive proof, documented fully, that the King James Version
is the nearest to the original autographs. They are entitled Which Bible and
True Or False.. We are not making any money out of the royalties.
I
have ordered the publisher to make out the last two royalty checks to the
Wealthy Street Baptist Church, and we are using the funds for the purpose
of giving them to missionaries and ministers who cannot afford them, so they
may have something solid to sink their teeth in and to stand upon when these
so-called intellectual critics begin to expound from their ivory towers and
look down their long noses at those who refuse to go along with them in their
pernicious errors.
I
just received recently a letter from a good friend of mine I have known for
years. He's one of the best Bible teachers in this country, and if I mentioned
his name I know that many of you would know who he was immediately. This is
what he says:
"If
I knew how to repent in sackcloth and ashes, I would begin immediately for
the unpardonable delay in acknowledging receipt of two of the most helpful
and timely volumes I have ever owned. I have carried these titles with me
all summer and immersed myself in them. I have never underscored books so
much as I have done in these. They enhanced my appreciation of the King James
Version as the true revelation of God as no other writings. I appreciate so
much your sending them to me. As a member of the editorial committee in the
production of the Amplified New Testament, we honestly and conscientiously
felt it was a mark of intelligence to follow Westcott and Hort. Now, what
you have in these books strikes terror to my heart. It proves alarmingly that
being conscientiously wrong is a most dangerous state of being. God help us
to be more cautious lest we fall into the snare of the archdeceiver."
WHAT
IS RIGHT WITH THE KJV?
Now
let's ask another question. What is right with the King James Version? I believe
with all my heart that there was a time in the early church when God blessed
certain men to choose the twenty-seven books which comprise our New Testament,
and in this order we have them now. The proof for that is in the Bible.
There
they are. Twenty-seven books in that particular order. Just so, I believe
God was very definitely in the choosing of the forty- seven scholars who came
together at the command of King James I around 1605 to produce a new version
of the Bible. We are bold enough to say that we don't believe there was ever
such a collection of great, I mean truly great, scholars as these who were
so chosen.
For
instance, there was John Boys. What a scholar he was! At the age of five years
old, he could read the Bible in Hebrew, and at the age of fourteen he was
a proficient Greek scholar. And for years he spent from four o'clock in the
morning until eight o'clock at night at the Cambridge library studying languages.
You
see, friend, listen, he was nor cursed with television, or telephone, or radio.
He had time to think, and to meditate, and to study. He wasn't flitting from
this Bible conference to another one, and being "oh'd" and "ah'd"
at by an adoring crowd.
Another
was Lancelot Andrewes, who was the overall chairman of the committee. He was
the greatest linguist of his day. He knew, was familiar with, and spoke nearly
twenty languages, including Arabic, Hebrew, and many others. He spent five
hours a day in prayer.
Not
only Lancelot Andrewes and John Boys, but practically all the other men chosen
for this monumental work of the King James Version were men of note throughout,
not only in their own country, but in other countries as well.
You
see, God knows what he is doing. He always does, and He chose that particular
time and age when the English language was at its zenith, to use these men
for that purpose.
Something
else of note should be mentioned here, too. I am sure some of you who hear
this message know of William Tyndale. He was one of the greatest of scholars.
He was the one who said the time will come when every plow boy in England
will be able to read the Bible. William Tyndale was at home in eight languages.
He
translated all of the New Testament and some parts of the Old Testament. He
did such a tremendous job that the King James translators kept well over sixty
percent of his translation intact, just as it was, to be used in the King
James translation. William Tyndale was hounded like a wild animal by those
who hated him and wanted him burned at the stake.
Finally
King Henry VII, through one of his stooges, caused Tyndale to be betrayed.
He was thrown in prison, and finally at Vilvord, just outside of Brussels,
Belgium, he was strangled to death by order of the king, and then his body
was burned. Now, the last thing he said before he died, was this: "Oh,
God, open the eyes of the king of England!"
And
do you know what? God answered that prayer in less than a year, when all of
England had the Bible in the English language. It has been my privilege to
stand there at that small monument that was erected some years after in Tyndale's
memory.
Another
thing we need to note also is that practically every one of the committee
of the revisers of the King James Version had been through suffering of one
kind or another. Either they themselves had been apprehended and put in jail,
or loved ones of theirs had the same thing done to them.
Now
such men had deep convictions and also a holy reverence for the Word of God
which you don't find in modern-day scholars. Many scholars of many versions
this day, such as the Revised Standard Version, or the New English Bible,
or the Good News for Modern Man, and many others, do not believe that the
Bible should be approached in any different way from any other book.
They
refuse to accept it as the infallible, inerrant, inspired Word of God, and
Westcott and Hort believed this same thing. Nowhere can you find in their
writings a statement that they believed in the verbally, inspired Word of
God.
Now
let me say here before I go any further, I have never claimed to be a scholar.
I do not claim to be one now, and I never expect to claim to be one. But there
are two very definite claims that I make without hesitation, or trepidation,
or reservation.
One
is I claim to have studied under some of the greatest scholars this country
has ever produced, if not the world. It was my privilege to be a student at
Princeton Seminary and to graduate from that institution just before the flood.
I mean by that before the flood of modernism. Today Princeton is modernistic
in every sense of the world, but not then. There were giants in the earth
in those days.
Consider
Robert Dick Wilson. He was one of the greatest linguists this country has
ever seen. He was at home in, and knew, and spoke forty-five languages and
dialects. He was a contemporary of the great scholar of Oxford, England, Dr.
Driver, who claimed that the book of Daniel was wrong because of certain statements
or phrases in it. Dr. Wilson spent years going through some 50,000 manuscripts
to prove that Driver was wrong and that Daniel was right.
A
second claim is that I can tell a true Christian scholar when I hear him,
or read his works, or talk with him. By Christian I mean one who holds to
and reverences the Word of God as being THE Word of God, and as being different
from any other book that has ever been published because it is the only book
that God ever wrote.
And
the men of Princeton in my day believed just that. When we went out of their
classes, we were strengthened in our faith concerning the Word of God to be
just what it is. Today they tear it down, criticize it, emasculate it, make
fun of it. May God help such men when they stand before a holy God.
ERASMUS
Some
of you have heard the name Desiderius Erasmus. He was born in 1466 and died
in 1536. He was known as a Renaissance humanist, born in Rotterdam, Holland,
educated by the Brethren of the Common Life. He entered an Augustinian monastery;
he was ordained a priest in 1492 and became secretary to the Bishop of Cambrai.
Later,
after studying four years of theology at the Sorbonne in Paris, he became
disgusted with the decadent scholasticism. In 1499 he went to England where
he became friends with John Colet and Thomas More. It was Colet that revealed
to him his true vocation, the rejuvenation of theology by basing it on scientific,
accurate documents, especially the Greek originals of the New Testament and
the earliest fathers of the church.
Erasmus
could do the work of ten men. He was that brilliant. And such an indefatigable
worker. He was courted by kings. The reigning king of England offered him
anything in his realm if he would become a citizen of that nation. The king
of France did the same thing. Holland made great preparations to advertise
him as their own native son.
He
refused to take sides when the Reformation storm broke with Luther's 95 Theses,
but I honestly believe that Erasmus was saved. He held in the deepest reverence
the Word of God. We are told that he had access to Codex Vaticanus and was
offered it to be used in his studies. He rejected it because he had found
it untrustworthy. He was offered the cardinal's hat by the pope of Rome. This
he refused.
It
is also said that he could have become pope if he had engineered it in the
right way and pulled the right strings, but he refused to do this because
in his famous book, In Praise of Folly, in a very satirical way he exposed
the terrible sins of the Roman Catholic Church of that day.
Erasmus
was responsible for the Textus Receptus, or the Received Text, that Greek
text upon which the King James Version is founded. He made five editions of
it, we are told, and in each one he made small changes that enhanced the meaning
of certain phrases, or verses.
Then
the Elzevir brothers brought out several editions of it, and so did Stephens,
and Beza, the successor of Calvin, who brought out nine editions. All in all
there were some twenty-one editions of the Textus Receptus from Erasmus through
Beza, but from the first edition to the last there were no major changes,
but merely minor ones, which is another proof of the way in which God kept
His Word all through the ages.
As
I have said before so say I now again, there are those people who tell us
today that there is no version of the Scripture that is without error. Very
well, then, where does the doctrine of inerrancy go if there are errors in
the Bible? They come back with that statement, Well, we believe that the original
autographs were inspired, but not those copies of them.
We
agree that the originals were inspired, but my question is simply this: If
God wrote this Book in the beginning, wasn't He able to keep it intact and
pure and without error all through the ages? My answer to that is that He
certainly was and He still is so capable. I would remind you again that God
is jealous for His Word, just as much as He is jealous for His blessed Son,
Jesus Christ.
If
someone says to you that all manuscripts and all versions today have errors
in them, then ask them in return what kind of a God they worship. A careless
or impotent God in my book is a monstrosity. I believe that the King James
Version does not have any errors.
Please
remember this. You and I are facing, as I have said before, the most vicious
and malicious attack upon the Word of God that has ever been made since the
garden of Eden, and the modern attack began with the publication of the Revised
Version of 1881. This is an unpopular cause at present in Christian circles.
I have found this out again and again, and I am going to find it out in the
future.
But
I can say as far as I am concerned it doesn't make any difference what happens
to me, but it makes a whale of a difference what happens to the cause of Jesus
Christ. And someday you and I, my friend, will have to stand before a holy
God and give an account to what we did or did not do in seeking to open the
eyes of people to the facts that have been covered up for so long concerning
His holy, indestructible, impregnable Word.
The
hour is late; the time is short; hell is filling; Christ is coming; and what
do we had better do in a hurry. I have told my people, and I am telling you,
if you are willing to sweep the television cobwebs out of your brain and put
that boob tube down in the basement two, three, or four weeks, or even longer,
as far as I am concerned, and sit down and study these books and other material,
you will learn firsthand just what the score is. And it will increase your
faith immeasurably, even as it has done mine.
I
give all the credit to God Himself for having these books published. The material
that we have collected for these books, I want to be frank with you, I marvel
again and again at how God led me to this source, and to that source, and
helped me to put it together. I don't want to take one bit of credit for this.
I want to give God all of the glory and the honor, and I am hoping that those
who are listening will get the vision of this whole situation, because if
we do not have an infallible, inerrant, inspired Book to rest our weary souls
upon for time and eternity, then your salvation and mine isn't worth the paper
it's printed on.
This
is the most important question anybody could ever discuss in Christian circles,
far more than your salvation and mine. The reason for that is that the battleground
is the Bible. Is it true, or is it not true? Is it without error, or is it
filled with error?
I
maintain that the whole reason why there are nearly one hundred versions in
print is because of one main reason: MONEY. And you can spell that with capitals,
and you can underscore it, and put it in red, if you want to. May God help
us! May God help you listening now to take your stand for what you know is
right, and not budge or move for one single minute.
You
may be laughed at, scorned and scoffed at, and treated with contempt, but
so what. If God be for us who can be against us? Those in the past who have
done a tremendous work for God have had these same things to face. We need
men, we need women, we need young people today with backbone made out of pig
iron instead of wet spaghetti.
I
want you to keep clearly in mind this, which is a basic essential to understanding
something about this complex question, namely, the King James Version is founded
squarely on the Textus Receptus, which is in 90-95% agreement with the five
thousand extant Greek manuscripts.
But
the Westcott and Hort text is in disagreement with them just about as much,
and is founded upon two of the worst of texts, Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.
Thus if you reject or look down upon the KJV, and settle for a mutilated Bible,
you go ahead, but count me out. I do not say that you cannot profit from reading
other versions. You can. But if they are based on the Westcott and Hort text,
they are immediately suspect and you should be mighty careful that you check
that version with the KJV as closely as possible.
Now
practically all versions of the Scriptures today, with exception to the King
James, are based upon the Westcott and Hort Greek text. So there you are;
take your choice. When you see that the King James Version is nearest to the
original manuscripts, in spite of what hundreds and thousands of others say,
it's going to be an uphill battle and it's going to be a rough. But, then,
who are we "to be taken to the skies on flowery beds of ease, while others
fought to win the prize and sailed through bloody seas?"
There
is so much at stake just now--the authority, the accuracy, the inerrancy of
the holy Word of a holy God. And if ever the Lord needed those of His followers
to take a stand for His Word and refuse to budge, it is now.
Over
one hundred years ago, in 1863, a convocation of the bishops and archbishops
of the Church of England was held. They were meeting to protest and censor
the heresy of one of their number, Bishop Colenzo, concerning the Word of
God. They issued the following statement: "All our hopes for eternity,
the very foundation of our faith, our nearest and dearest consolation, are
taken away from us if one line of that sacred book, the Bible, be declared
unfaithful or untrustworthy."
And
this man wants the world to know that he stands squarely with these great
scholars of the last century on this all-important subject, the infallibility
and inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures. It is true that God can use almost anything
or anyone to bring souls to Himself. He used Balaam to utter some of the greatest
prophecies, and God also used a dumb animal to rebuke the madness of the prophet
(2 Pet. 2:16). And God uses perversions of His Word in the salvation of souls,
but this fact does not for one moment warrant us in keeping quiet when the
holy Bible is being treated in such a slipshod, untrustworthy manner.
These
are desperate days. They are filling with fear and foreboding. The end is
in sight. Multitudes of Christians are confused, with nearly a hundred versions,
or paraphrases, of God's Holy Word in print. We dare not, if we truly love
Him, play with the living Word of the living God. I urge my listener to keep
before him the KJV as the one safe, sure standard to go by in measuring other
versions.
|
© 2007 The Flaming Torch, All rights reserved.
|